osx bärglöi am DI oder MI

[ritschi]

has doch vo dere website. da:
http://www.apple.com/osx/specs/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[swordfish]

hmm

[Uriel]

I de Systemiistellige chasch jetzt Airplay Gräät als Boxe uuswähle. Es gaht au über Alt Klick im Menu.

Streaming vo all mim Sound vo allne Programm übers Homecinema. OMG! Hami schu lang gfraaget, wenn das endlich chunnt und ich nümme uf so super Hacks mues zruggriffe.

[Mr Burzel]

Streaming vo all mim Sound vo allne Programm übers Homecinema. OMG! Hami schu lang gfraaget, wenn das endlich chunnt und ich nümme uf so super Hacks mues zruggriffe.

Also mit PulseAudio uf Linux kasch au jetzt scho uf Airplay fähigi Grätli all din Sound streame

[Uriel]

Streaming vo all mim Sound vo allne Programm übers Homecinema. OMG! Hami schu lang gfraaget, wenn das endlich chunnt und ich nümme uf so super Hacks mues zruggriffe.

Also mit PulseAudio uf Linux kasch au jetzt scho uf Airplay fähigi Grätli all din Sound streame

Über gwüssi Programm isches ja scho immer gange, jetzt gahts halt systemwiit.
Ich han das im Fall nie zu 100% hanebracht: es het mr immer churzi underbrüch gee. Ebeso hani rächt Ärger mit Pulseaudio und 5.1 über HDMI mit ATI gha.
Laufts bi dir immer? weli distro?

[ritschi]

Streaming vo all mim Sound vo allne Programm übers Homecinema. OMG! Hami schu lang gfraaget, wenn das endlich chunnt und ich nümme uf so super Hacks mues zruggriffe.

Also mit PulseAudio uf Linux kasch au jetzt scho uf Airplay fähigi Grätli all din Sound streame

mountain lion isch o jetzt scho.

[ritschi]

The federal court jury in the patent infringement lawsuit between Apple and Samsung has presented its verdict after deliberating for just 21 hours and 37 minutes following the three week trial. This particular case started with Apple's lawsuit last April and now the jury's decision is that Samsung did infringe on Apple's '381 bounceback patent with all 21 of its products in question. For the '915 patent on pinch-and-zoom, the jury ruled all but three of the devices listed infringed, and more damningly, found that Samsung executives either knew or should have known their products infringed on the listed patents. The jury has also found against Samsung when it comes to Apple's contours on the back of the iPhone and its home screen GUI. The Galaxy Tab, was found not to have infringed upon Apple's iPad design patents. The bad news for Samsung continued however, as the jury decided that not only did it willfully infringe on five of the seven Apple patents, but also upheld their validity when it came to utility, design and trade dress.

The amount of the damages against Samsung is in: $1,051,855,000.00 (see below). That's less than half of the $2.5 billion it was seeking, but still more than enough to put an exclamation point on this victory for the team from Cupertino. The final number is $1,049,343,540, after the judge found an issue with how the jury applied damages for the Galaxy Tab 10.1 4G LTE and Intercept. The jury also ruled that Apple did not infringe upon Samsung's patents with the iPhone 3G and 3GS, and has awarded it zero dollars in damage. We'll have more information for you as it become available.

Update: Both companies have released statements on the matter, with Apple stating via the New York Times the ruling sends a loud and clear message that "stealing isn't right." Samsung has its own viewpoint calling this "a loss for the American consumer" that will lead to fewer choices, less innovation and high prices. You can see both in their entirety after the break.

[Gurgelhals]

Patentrecht abschaffe

[ritschi]

wahr